Friday, May 13, 2016

Rights

For over a year, we have been exposed to the “bathroom” debate.  States around our country have been tasked with making decisions about who can enter a bathroom in a public place.  On one side, those that gender-identify with something other than their birth gender and many supporters are calling for freedom to use public restrooms designated for the gender that they identify with, but were not necessarily born with.  On the other side, those that support gender-specific restrooms chosen based on physical-gender or birth-gender are calling for freedom to use public restrooms designated for the gender they were born with solely among like-gendered individuals.

Please allow me to point out how we should be looking at this issue:  The rights of BOTH groups are at stake.  We tend to look at this as a question of the rights of only one side of this issue, when in fact, both sides have rights.  This argument has raged and truly has moved from the heart of the matter to something far different.  The issue is about a segment of our population feeling comfortable using the restroom.  Instead of addressing this very real and serious conundrum, we have taken to pointing fingers and lashing out at each other.  We have turned this into a political debate about whose rights are more important.  THIS IS AMERICA.  WE ALL HAVE RIGHTS.  And my rights aren’t superior to anyone else’s, nor are they secondary.

When we were faced with a segment of our population that were not considered when building public places and spaces, laws were implemented to protect that segment of our population without discriminating against the remainder of our population.  As a result, we have handicap parking, handicap accessible restrooms, sidewalks, doorways and elevators among other mandated ‘handicap friendly’ changes to previously common building practices.  What a beautiful thing!  The non-handicap segment of our population isn’t forced to use certain doors, ramps or toilets. 

This isn’t that difficult.  A unisex restroom could solve the problem.  No one would be forced to feel uncomfortable or unsafe when going to the restroom.  What’s wrong with that solution?

Here’s what’s ‘wrong:’  Some people will have you believe we shouldn’t recognize the term “gender-identity.”  Likewise, some people will have you believe we shouldn’t use a person’s biological sex to determine gender.  (Do you see the problem?) Who’s right?  Some people have determined that rather than find a practical solution, they would rather channel efforts to making the other side wrong.  Let us take a moment to step back and gain some perspective on what it is that we are asking for, what we're upset about and how we can better respect one another and find solutions that allow all of us to feel comfortable and safe.